Ariadna · Frequently asked questions

It is a corporate and relationship investigation system that reconstructs links among people, companies, addresses, documents and scattered events to reveal structures that are invisible when each fact is reviewed in isolation.

CASANDRA DDE expands the investigation and discovers candidates, relationships and new sources. CERBERUS DRE verifies and refutes claims reproducibly. METIS ADE can, on request, evaluate whether the assembled evidence justifies human review. Ariadna provides domain logic, connectors, criteria and user experience while the engine cores remain separated. Each claim should remain connected to its supporting material. Failure to access a source is shown as missing information, not proof that an event did not occur. The institution can inspect what was and was not investigated before deciding to expand the work or refer an issue to a responsible person.

Architecture prevents a model from deciding by itself which evidence is allowed to exist. A rules-based baseline expansion runs before model prioritization; hypotheses must search for confirming evidence, evidence capable of destroying them and observations that discriminate between rival explanations. Uninvestigated eligible links remain recorded. The team needs to know which registers were consulted, which failed to respond and which paths remain unexplored. That helps direct the next review. The purpose is not to exhaust the internet or call an inquiry complete because it returned many results, but to preserve explainable coverage and open questions.

Patterns are compared against groups of similar organizations and expressed in understandable bands together with population size and coverage. An atypical configuration does not automatically become a conclusion: it triggers review of alternative explanations and evidence quality. Practical value lies in organising review and forming more specific questions. An unusual case may have a simple explanation; a common pattern may still need investigation for other reasons. Ariadna does not turn a statistical band into guilt or replace documentary examination with a label that sounds final.

The temporal sequence answers questions a static graph cannot: when a person appeared, which relationship existed before or after a change and how the structure evolved. Every relevant element should open its source, date and supporting fragment. A reviewer receiving the case should be able to follow the steps and open their supporting records. The timeline helps prepare review, communicate background and locate gaps. It does not invent dates to complete a diagram: an unknown date stays unknown and may change what can reasonably be concluded.

The panel is the working interface; the dossier is the defensible artifact. It includes versions, sources, claim classification, strong or weak identity, statistical comparison, alternative explanations, coverage, truncations, declared hypothesis, missing data and an explicit scope warning. Ariadna may provide a free licence to selected non-commercial institutions and public bodies, including ARCA. For-profit business use requires a commercial licence. Source-code access and conditions are agreed directly with OrvixLabs. This is not an unrestricted download, nor does a dossier replace the receiving institution's review.

When external models are involved, personal data passes through Varexis before leaving the controlled environment. The model can preserve relationships through opaque tokens without necessarily receiving real names or identifiers, and each protection operation can leave verifiable evidence. Before sources are added, agree on who can consult the case, how supporting records are retained and which outputs can be shared. The investigation's purpose remains the reference point. Ariadna should support those decisions and retain a record of activity, not expand the use of supplied information on its own.

Ariadna may offer a free usage licence to selected institutions pursuing a non-commercial purpose. The institution explains its investigation, the person responsible and the intended public or social benefit. This is not indiscriminate access or a tool for accusing or classifying people.

Public bodies may request access for authorised institutional research and analysis. ARCA is explicitly included in this policy even though its remit includes revenue collection or oversight. Purpose, responsibility, sources and data handling are reviewed before access is agreed; no existing agreement with any public body is implied.

For-profit use by businesses or institutions requires a paid commercial licence. Source-code access is defined by delivery conditions and is not unlimited permission for exploitation, redistribution or resale. Institutional classification does not replace review of the specific purpose of use.

Contact Carlos and OrvixLabs with the institution's identity, project purpose and responsible representative. Licences are agreed case by case with explicit usage and source-access permissions. This page offers no public repository and does not replace the licence agreement. Infrastructure, implementation and support are clarified separately from any usage-licence exemption.