From an event to a responsible conversation
A signal appears, is linked to a position and goes through checks. Only then does a person receive an understandable reason for contact. That sequence keeps detection and sending from becoming one inseparable automatic action that cannot be reviewed in time.
What the system contributes
- Detect a relevant window against the exact contract formula.
- Verify position, data freshness and contract-level hedge.
- Explain why the alert exists.
- A human approves or rejects contact and selects the channel.
- The system executes contact, records the reply and escalates to the salesperson when appropriate.
- The outcome is recorded without automatically claiming causality.
Approval also means being able to say no
A reviewer may reject an alert because of commercial context the system does not yet know. That rejection helps evaluate the criterion. When approved, the person chooses how to proceed and the contact is recorded alongside its response. Relevant conversations return to the salesperson rather than remaining trapped in automation.
Measure the whole journey
Counting sent messages is not enough. Review rejected alerts, data freshness, responses and handoffs. A contact can be appropriate without immediately producing a transaction. Vector preserves that distinction so the team can assess usefulness rather than mistake volume for commercial value.
A journey someone can explain
At the end, the responsible person needs more than a result. They also need to know which information was used, which alternative was selected and what actions remain pending. Being able to revisit those steps turns several engines working together into a sequence that the person accountable for the decision can understand.